Newswave

Chapter 14 - DANIEL SPEAKS

The defense argued Daniel should not testify.

They claimed the process would overwhelm him.

Daniel’s attorney responded that accommodations could protect him.

The judge agreed.

The courtroom lights were dimmed.

Questions were provided in advance.

Daniel could answer through speech, typing, or yes-and-no cards.

He entered wearing a blue sweater Dad had given him.

He did not swear on a Bible.

He affirmed that he understood truth and lies.

The prosecutor began simply.

“Do you know the defendant?”

Daniel typed:

“She is my mother.”

“Did you live with her?”

“Yes.”

“Did Mason live there?”

“Yes.”

“What happened before your meltdowns?”

Daniel paused.

“Mason shouted.”

“Mom locked doors.”

“They took tablet.”

“What happened at Blackridge?”

“Alarm.”

“Small room.”

“No clock.”

“Hands held.”

“Mom watched.”

“Did you agree to go?”

“No.”

“Did you ask to leave?”

“Yes.”

“What did they say?”

Daniel looked toward Mom.

Then typed:

“They said Claire did not want me.”

I closed my eyes.

The prosecutor continued.

“Did you believe them?”

“Sometimes.”

“Why did you take the coat camera?”

“Dad said proof.”

“Did anyone help you create the recordings?”

“No.”

“Did Claire tell you what to type?”

“No.”

“Do you want Claire to control your money?”

“No.”

A few people in the courtroom shifted.

Daniel continued.

“I want trustee.”

“I choose Claire for help.”

“Not control.”

That distinction mattered.

Mom’s attorney approached for cross-examination.

His voice was gentle.

Too gentle.

“Daniel, you become upset when routines change, correct?”

“Yes.”

“You sometimes push objects?”

“Yes.”

“You pushed Mason?”

“Yes.”

“Then you can be aggressive.”

Daniel typed for a long time.

“Pushing door to escape is not attacking.”

The attorney changed direction.

“Your father told you your mother was dangerous.”

“Dad said watch actions.”

“So he influenced you.”

“Dad gave information.”

“Claire also tells you what happened.”

“Claire asks me.”

The attorney held up one edited video.

“You threw this chair.”

“Yes.”

“Could it have injured someone?”

“Yes.”

“Were you dangerous?”

Daniel’s hands shook.

Maya raised a pause card.

The judge allowed five minutes.

Daniel put on headphones.

He breathed slowly.

Then he removed them.

The attorney repeated the question.

Daniel typed:

“Danger happened before chair.”

“Mason blocked door.”

“Mom took voice.”

“I made exit.”

The courtroom remained silent.

The attorney tried one final strategy.

“Do you still love your mother?”

Mom began crying again.

Daniel looked at her.

His face tightened.

Then he typed:

“Yes.”

Mom’s attorney smiled.

Daniel continued.

“Love does not make safe.”

The smile disappeared.

The prosecutor asked one final question.

“What do you want the jury to understand?”

Daniel’s answer appeared word by word.

“I knew.”

“I remembered.”

“I said no.”

“They called it meltdown because no was inconvenient.”

May you like

No witness spoke after him that day.

No one needed to.

Related Stories

Other posts